6/15/2023 0 Comments Mancova gpowerSocial support has also been divided into two sub-categories: received social support and perceived social support. Social support refers to the availability of individuals that could provide potential or actual support (i.e., structural and functional support) in terms of personal resources. In the next section, we briefly review the relationship between the two constructs, followed by an overview of the present study.Ģ. The main objective of the present study is to extend the past correlational findings by shedding light on the causality of social support and creativity. Notably, the beneficial relationship was documented in different contexts and populations, implying that social support is one of the key factors for creativity. Similarly, social support was consistently found to have a positive correlation with creativity. Indeed, empirical findings from different disciplines have shown that creativity can be benefited by a variety of factors such as personality, autonomy, and culture, executive thinking style, and knowledge fixation, just to name a few. In other words, multiple sources are required for the development of creativity. Ĭreativity is “the interaction among aptitude, process and environment by which an individual or group produces a perceptible product that is both novel and useful as defined within a social context” (p. Moreover, creativity has been found to enhance university students’ subjective well-being. For instance, creativity is negatively associated with behavioral and social instability and stress, while positively correlated with well-being and work performance. Empirical studies have also shown that creativity is critical to individuals’ well-being and performance. Our findings not only offer empirical evidence of the causality of social support and creativity but also has practical value for creativity development.Ĭreativity has been consistently recognized as a critical competency in the development and sustainability of organizations. The results demonstrated that the manipulation is effective and the induced perceived social support leads to higher creativity. Multivariate analysis of covariance showed that, after statistically controlling for the effect of creative self-efficacy, participants in the experimental group reported higher scores in perceived social support and all creativity measures than their counterparts in the control group. Both groups also answered a divergent thinking test (measured for fluency, flexibility, and originality) and a self-rated creativity scale. Perceived social support was primed by a writing test and measured by the Multidimensional Scales of Perceived Social Support. All participants first answered the creative self-efficacy scale and were then randomly allocated to the experimental and control groups. A total of 135 undergraduate students in Malaysia participated in an online experiment. The present study addressed this need by exploring the impact of experimentally induced perceived social support on creativity among young adults. However, further investigation is needed to clarify the causal relationship between the two constructs. The literature has consistently shown that social support has a positive relationship with creativity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |